Remember when doctors were seen in advertisements promoting cigarettes? Knowing what we do today that seems like insanity, and yet cigarettes were not only thought to be safe but they were considered beneficial. Hard to believe? Well it’s happening again with wireless technology. Doctors may not be doing the promoting this time but the assumption of safety is the same. But is wireless safe? And if it isn’t, why haven’t we heard anything about the hazards?
According to Dr. Devra Davis, President of the Environmental Health Trust, to answer these questions, we have to go back to the 1994 research sponsored by the Military and Motorola, which was the first to show brain damage as a side effect of wireless.
The response to this new information was swift; funding was cancelled, and a memo began to circulate throughout the telecommunications industry to “war game the science”. And apparently they have been successful, until now.
Let’s start with the work of Martin Blank, Associate Professor, Department of Cellular Biophysics, at Colombia University, whose research showed that EMF (wireless) stimulates stress hormones in cells – indicating an assault on the cell. According to Professor Blank, cells only make stress proteins when they have come into contact with something they feel is potentially harmful. The more fear or stress the organism perceives, the more energy it directs to protection. Simply put, a cell cannot be in a state of growth and protection at the same time. In other words, the more exposure the cell experiences, the less and less energy there is available for repair and reproduction.
Now this leads us to the findings of Professor Martin Pall, who after 18 years of research has put the pieces of the puzzle together. Pall, who has a degree in physics and a PhD in biochemistry and genetics, has traced which mechanisms of the body are affected by wireless. He explains that the physics and the biochemistry are pointing to the same thing: wireless (EMF) activates the voltage gated calcium channels (VGCC’s) which allows the calcium outside the cell (normally 1000 times higher) to flood the inside of the cell, essentially poisoning it. This also lowers the usable calcium in the bloodstream which can cause many problems, including uncontrolled bleeding.
What does this mean in terms of disease?
In simple language, the VGCC’s are sensors located in the outer membrane of each cell that are extremely sensitive to the electrical forces of wireless. Exposure activates the VGCC’s triggering excessive calcium signalling. The highest density of VGCC’s are found in the nervous system, the heart and the reproductive system.
When VGCC’s are activated in the brain, they release neurotransmitters and neuroendocrine hormones. According to Pall, chronic exposure to wireless, produces a list of problems that range from; anxiety and depression to autism and Alzheimer’s. At this time, Alzheimer’s is bordering on epidemic, and the incidence of children being diagnosed with autism is rapidly increasing. You can’t help but ask the question, could this be the cause?
When these channels are activated in the heart, the pacemaker cells, because of the high concentration of VGCC’s, can lose control of the heartbeat, producing cardiac arrhythmias (which is associated with sudden cardiac death), slow and fast heart rates, fibrillation, atrial fluttering and heart palpitations.
And last but not least, the reproductive system, in which exposure can produce both male and female infertility. The male tests are the most densely populated by the VGCC’s, so they suffer the most damage. Again, we know that sperm counts in men have been on the decline for several years – could this be a contributing factor? We also have Professor Blank’s research that cells under attack divert energy away from reproduction and growth, to protection, two separate mechanisms shutting down fertility. The list goes on.
When the EMF activates the VGCC’s in the body, it triggers a chain reaction producing excessive amounts of ROS, the most destructive free radicals known. These free radicals decimate the mitochondrial and the nuclear DNA, their membranes and proteins. The end result is mitochondrial dysfunction, which we now know is at the heart of most chronic diseases.
These were Pall’s findings in 2013, before his study of 5G. In his 2018 document, he adds additional damage to his previous list of assaults on the body involving 5G exposure.
- The aqueous and vitreous humor in the eye appear to be an ideal environment for the regeneration of the electrical fields within the eye. The downstream effects of the VGCC activation could cause cataracts, detached retinas, glaucoma and macular degeneration. We may therefore look forward to a gigantic epidemic of blindness.
- 5G also produces elevated levels of apoptosis or programmed cell death. This new condition, resulting from this, is being referred to as RAS (Rapid Ageing Syndrome).
- Interferes with the uptake of oxygen in the body.
- Attacks on the DNA of our cells, producing single and double strand breaks in cellular DNA and oxidized bases in DNA. These in turn produce cancer and mutations.
- The sweat glands in humans can act as antennas for the millimetre waves causing changes in the structure of the sweat duct affecting energy absorptions through the skin.
Now let’s take a look at what is happening to other organisms, bacteria for example. In 2017 Olle Johansson, Associate Professor at Karolinska Department of Neoscience in Sweden, found that bacteria exposed to mobile phones and wifi became resistant to antibiotics. The medical community has been very vocal about the rising number of antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria which they attribute to over use of the drug. Could wireless actually be the real cause?
What about the bees?
Dr. Devra Davis cites a recent study where a cell phone was placed in a hive of bees and within 10 days the worker bees never returned. Could this be contributing to hive collapse? These are just a few of the studies done worldwide that show the magnitude of the problem.
To help you understand what is happening to cause such damage to our bodies, let’s go to Dr Joel Moskowitz, UC Berkeley School of Public Health, who states that it is the frequency modulation, the erratic and irregular pulses that affect biology much more than the radiation. For example, your cell phone sends 900 pulsed signals a minute – that’s 9000 erratic pulses in just 10 minutes. And if you think that’s shocking, just keep reading. The smarter the device, the more information carried, the more extreme the pulsing. If you wear braces they will be broadcasting these frequencies in your mouth and if you sleep on a mattress with springs, those springs will broadcast into your body through the night.
Wireless radiation in the MHz GHz and THz is literally millions, billions and trillions times (respectively), the normal frequency of the earth – the Schumann resonance of 7.83Hz.
According to Dr. Devra Davis, President of Environmental Health Trust, referring to 5G, “most people are unaware that these 5G waves are cycling several billion times (PER SECOND), 75G is in fact 75,000,000,000 cycles per second, which can induce unpleasant burning sensations on the skin!” (Remember Pall’s work that the sweat glands act like antennas).
Utilizing current 3G and 4G wireless frequencies, 5G will attach even more higher frequency waves, which will add to, not replace, current technology. So in addition to millions of new 5G base stations on earth and 20,000 new satellites in space, 200 million transmitting objects, according to estimates will be part of the Internet of Things by 2020 and one trillion a few years later.
Small cell towers are being installed in residential neighbourhoods in close proximity to houses on light poles and in some cases broadcasting directly into windows.
Many insurance companies are now excluding injuries due to electromagnetic frequencies, in order to pre-empt the run on claims, due to damages. Looks like they’ve seen the research.
At this point you must be feeling quite overwhelmed and possibly powerless so let’s talk about what you can do to help yourself.
How can we protect ourselves?
The following is a list of things that you can do to help protect yourself from the damage of wireless:
- Use a landline phone – the type of phone that has a cord, not a cordless phone.
- Avoid using a cell phone, if you cannot avoid it, minimise its use by texting or place it on speaker away from your head. Plug in head phones that go directly into your ears are not an option.
- Do not carry a cell phone anywhere on your body. They send out periodic pulsing even when they are not in use. If you have to carry it use a shielded case.
- Do not use a cell phone when you are in the car, even with a hands free kit, or in any moving vehicle because when a phone is moving it has to put out a stronger signal in order to maintain a connection.
- If you have wireless routers or wireless enabled devices, use traditional cable based internet.
- Do not get a smart meter. Inform your electric company that you refuse permission for your meter to be replaced (for information on this issue see www.stopsmartmeters.org.nz, www.stopsmartmeters.com.au, stopsmartmeters.org).
- Do not allow children to talk on mobile phones. Their bodies are much more vulnerable than adults. Avoid wireless baby monitors as these leave you and your baby susceptible to unnecessary exposure.
The push back on 5G is under way across the world
Over 180 Doctors and scientists in almost 40 countries, by way of “Resolution 1815 of the Council of Europe” are warning about the dangers of 5G. Poland’s Prime Minister has signed the Global appeal to stop 5G.
Brussels, Geneva and Vaud have banned any upgrades to 5G, as it is unsafe due to health reasons.
Belgium, (centre of the European Union), has halted the rollout.
Switzerland decided to delay 5G.
In the United Sates, New Hampshire decided to study the risks before allowing 5G.
The Louisiana Senate has requested studies to prove the safety of upgrades before allowing 5G to proceed.
In California the city of Mill Valley has banned 5G, with other cities beginning to follow suit.
Australia has taken a different and very successful tact. Barrister Ray Broomhall has developed a legal template by which an individual can stop the towers going up. For information on how this process works, see his video at https:/www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fu8fyMI9HEE.
Lastly, and certainly the most interesting response is from Israel. The place where 5G was created has not only banned the 5G rollout, they are still using 3G with copper wiring. I think this alone speaks volumes as to the safety and health risks of wireless.
The science is simple – the electrical systems that govern all the body’s processes can be disrupted by wireless technology. This in turn, swamps natural electromagnetic cues and causes malfunction of the normal biological rhythms that direct the mechanisms of growth, metabolism, and repair. The result of these disruptions is that the body can no longer maintain health.
This may not prove to be the smoking gun for some people, but it is certainly enough evidence for most people to consider a moratorium on this ‘Grand Experiment’ until more independent research has been done.
Let’s not take the same leap of faith we did with cigarettes, because unlike cigarettes, there are no smoke free zones with wireless.